<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And man said, let there be God</title>
	<atom:link href="http://de-conversion.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://de-conversion.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/</link>
	<description>Resources for skeptical, de-converting, or former Christians......</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fritz M. Amtsberg</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-2337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fritz M. Amtsberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 03:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-2337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My take on the existence of god is this. Christians sys that god is an infinitely perfect being who made all things and keeps them in existence.  Other religions have their definitions.  The fact that &quot;There Is&quot; implies that something &quot;Always Was&quot;.  So &quot;Always Was&quot; can be defined as &quot;god&quot;.

The fact that mankind has killed &quot;non believers&quot; of there faiths since they found out how to kill leads me to believe that &quot;Always Was&quot; ain’t to interested in what goes on on earth. I believe that this shows the maturity of &quot;Always Was&quot; not to be involved in mans inability to live with man without making up a definition of god and killing non-believers of their definition of god in the process.

Seems like radical religion is a cyclic behavior of man and as we grow technically the results become more catastrophic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take on the existence of god is this. Christians sys that god is an infinitely perfect being who made all things and keeps them in existence.  Other religions have their definitions.  The fact that &#8220;There Is&#8221; implies that something &#8220;Always Was&#8221;.  So &#8220;Always Was&#8221; can be defined as &#8220;god&#8221;.</p>
<p>The fact that mankind has killed &#8220;non believers&#8221; of there faiths since they found out how to kill leads me to believe that &#8220;Always Was&#8221; ain’t to interested in what goes on on earth. I believe that this shows the maturity of &#8220;Always Was&#8221; not to be involved in mans inability to live with man without making up a definition of god and killing non-believers of their definition of god in the process.</p>
<p>Seems like radical religion is a cyclic behavior of man and as we grow technically the results become more catastrophic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PB and J</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PB and J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 15:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gaki

i am not sure if you were pting that out to me, but i think i was actually saying the opposite.  i make no assumptions that it was written that long ago.  however, your facts arent correct either.  the dead sea scrolls are the oldest OT, but there are older fragments of the NT than 400.  the oldest manuscript complete is 400, but not fragments.  

anyway, i wasnt trying to prove prophecy.  i was pting out that it is a silly ad hominem attack to put the  Bible down because it was written by &quot;wandering desert nomads&quot;.  

shalom
peter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gaki</p>
<p>i am not sure if you were pting that out to me, but i think i was actually saying the opposite.  i make no assumptions that it was written that long ago.  however, your facts arent correct either.  the dead sea scrolls are the oldest OT, but there are older fragments of the NT than 400.  the oldest manuscript complete is 400, but not fragments.  </p>
<p>anyway, i wasnt trying to prove prophecy.  i was pting out that it is a silly ad hominem attack to put the  Bible down because it was written by &#8220;wandering desert nomads&#8221;.  </p>
<p>shalom<br />
peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaki</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gaki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 06:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I love is the assumption that the Old Testament was actually written 1500 to 500BC or so.  No New Testament older than 400AD has been found.  No Old Testament older than the Dead Sea Scrolls (roughly 150BC-50AD and mostly incomplete) has been found.

As I&#039;ve said to many of my Christian friends:  a prophecy ain&#039;t a prophecy until you have proof you said it BEFORE the events happened.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I love is the assumption that the Old Testament was actually written 1500 to 500BC or so.  No New Testament older than 400AD has been found.  No Old Testament older than the Dead Sea Scrolls (roughly 150BC-50AD and mostly incomplete) has been found.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said to many of my Christian friends:  a prophecy ain&#8217;t a prophecy until you have proof you said it BEFORE the events happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PB and J</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PB and J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 22:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think it is very easy to explain away the &quot;authors&quot; of the Bible if you try to label them as unthinking nomadic, desert wanderers.  but unfortunately, this isnt really so.  in fact, according to textual critics from without &quot;christianity&quot; the OT wasnt even written by Moses, but later.  this means that the hebrews had already settled in canaan.  they had begun to be an established nation.  

and certainly then as far as the NT goes, these men were raised in a hellenistic world.  they were some wandering nomad.  

dont get me wrong, i am not trying to prove that the Bible is correct.  but i think it is invalid to deny any validity based upon the nomadic argument.  

as a side note, socrates was a nomadic philosopher who wandered around talking to people and making disciples and he lived before Yeshua the Nazrene. but socrates is probably the greatest (or certainly one of them) philosopher of all time.  his disciples&#039; works (plato) are incredible works.  and his disciples&#039; disciple aristotle pretty much cleans up the rest.  it has been said that between plato and aristotle there is nothing left to say.  anyway, my point is that we tend to be pretty proud of our own sophistication and intellect, when there were many ancients who far surpassed most of us.

peter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it is very easy to explain away the &#8220;authors&#8221; of the Bible if you try to label them as unthinking nomadic, desert wanderers.  but unfortunately, this isnt really so.  in fact, according to textual critics from without &#8220;christianity&#8221; the OT wasnt even written by Moses, but later.  this means that the hebrews had already settled in canaan.  they had begun to be an established nation.  </p>
<p>and certainly then as far as the NT goes, these men were raised in a hellenistic world.  they were some wandering nomad.  </p>
<p>dont get me wrong, i am not trying to prove that the Bible is correct.  but i think it is invalid to deny any validity based upon the nomadic argument.  </p>
<p>as a side note, socrates was a nomadic philosopher who wandered around talking to people and making disciples and he lived before Yeshua the Nazrene. but socrates is probably the greatest (or certainly one of them) philosopher of all time.  his disciples&#8217; works (plato) are incredible works.  and his disciples&#8217; disciple aristotle pretty much cleans up the rest.  it has been said that between plato and aristotle there is nothing left to say.  anyway, my point is that we tend to be pretty proud of our own sophistication and intellect, when there were many ancients who far surpassed most of us.</p>
<p>peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brendan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 16:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All &quot;beliefs&quot; are constructs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All &#8220;beliefs&#8221; are constructs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arrgjonsmad</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arrgjonsmad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 16:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you only question the Christian belief? or do you do this to all the other beliefs?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you only question the Christian belief? or do you do this to all the other beliefs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brendan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 15:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no &quot;Beginning&quot; without people to create it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no &#8220;Beginning&#8221; without people to create it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: layguy</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[layguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 15:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol - your creation story made me laugh!  I am away on a work trip in Sydney and am stuck in my hotel room and have enjoyed a bottle of wine - hence my spelling mistakes - please fix them for me AA.

Your story reflects the pathetic things done by mankind under the &quot;religion&quot; banner and what you write about is true.

A friend of mine who was a nuclear physicist and left his career to plant 1,000 churches in Asia once said to me, &quot;God intended the Kingdom of God on earth.  Man made it the church.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol &#8211; your creation story made me laugh!  I am away on a work trip in Sydney and am stuck in my hotel room and have enjoyed a bottle of wine &#8211; hence my spelling mistakes &#8211; please fix them for me AA.</p>
<p>Your story reflects the pathetic things done by mankind under the &#8220;religion&#8221; banner and what you write about is true.</p>
<p>A friend of mine who was a nuclear physicist and left his career to plant 1,000 churches in Asia once said to me, &#8220;God intended the Kingdom of God on earth.  Man made it the church.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: layguy</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[layguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 15:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;In the beginning&quot; does not have to mean that Moses was there.  Just like historians don&#039;t have to prove they were there about the subjects they write about.  Your logic is flawed my friend.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In the beginning&#8221; does not have to mean that Moses was there.  Just like historians don&#8217;t have to prove they were there about the subjects they write about.  Your logic is flawed my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 14:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/and-man-said-let-there-be-god/#comment-1196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*not applied to God (correction for the end of the first paragraph)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*not applied to God (correction for the end of the first paragraph)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
