<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defending &#8220;Doubting Thomas&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://de-conversion.com/2008/02/20/defending-thomas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/02/20/defending-thomas/</link>
	<description>Resources for skeptical, de-converting, or former Christians......</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TheNorEaster</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/02/20/defending-thomas/#comment-18058</link>
		<dc:creator>TheNorEaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=743#comment-18058</guid>
		<description>TA:

Juries do not testify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TA:</p>
<p>Juries do not testify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinking Ape</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/02/20/defending-thomas/#comment-16585</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinking Ape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=743#comment-16585</guid>
		<description>TheNorEaster,
&lt;blockquote&gt;But if you, or anyone, has believed at all then your faith has already surpassed Thomas and The Disciples because you have not seen the risen Christ after the crucifixion&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Somehow it is not comforting to know that one' faith, two-thousand years later, supercedes that of the people we supposedly gain our only source about the religious tradition one is to have faith in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TheNorEaster,</p>
<blockquote><p>But if you, or anyone, has believed at all then your faith has already surpassed Thomas and The Disciples because you have not seen the risen Christ after the crucifixion</p></blockquote>
<p>Somehow it is not comforting to know that one&#8217; faith, two-thousand years later, supercedes that of the people we supposedly gain our only source about the religious tradition one is to have faith in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheNorEaster</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/02/20/defending-thomas/#comment-16584</link>
		<dc:creator>TheNorEaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=743#comment-16584</guid>
		<description>"I consider it unreasonable that I should be expected to surpass them in faith."

With all due respect, I'm afraid I have to disagree with you on this one.  Thomas only believed when he had seen Christ after the crucifixion.  But if you, or anyone, has believed at all then your faith has already surpassed Thomas and The Disciples because you have not seen the risen Christ after the crucifixion (and you didn't see Jesus feed the poor, heal the sick, or raise Lazarus, either).  And this I think is made clear in John 20:29.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I consider it unreasonable that I should be expected to surpass them in faith.&#8221;</p>
<p>With all due respect, I&#8217;m afraid I have to disagree with you on this one.  Thomas only believed when he had seen Christ after the crucifixion.  But if you, or anyone, has believed at all then your faith has already surpassed Thomas and The Disciples because you have not seen the risen Christ after the crucifixion (and you didn&#8217;t see Jesus feed the poor, heal the sick, or raise Lazarus, either).  And this I think is made clear in John 20:29.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Next</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/02/20/defending-thomas/#comment-16516</link>
		<dc:creator>The Next</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=743#comment-16516</guid>
		<description>Ah, Time adds Doubt. I've seen the same in my visit to this orb. I raise the dead, kill, drop trees in patterns, heal the sick, etc. Folks are astounded during the act, but a few weeks later, their lives have muddied the waters and it isn't so clear that it wasn't just incredible chance. Here's a bit from my book,
 Quantum 1004 50 2008 Magic (I'll be publishing soon):


The Seeding

On October 4, 1957 the Soviet Union launched the first of humanity's machines to reach my realm. Sputnik means "co-traveler" so I hitched a ride and waited 92 days to plummet to Earth on the burning Star of Sputnik exactly 9 months before I was born on October 4, 1958. I entered the developing egg of a random woman and waited.



So...a new player arrives on the field. 92 is such an important number...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Time adds Doubt. I&#8217;ve seen the same in my visit to this orb. I raise the dead, kill, drop trees in patterns, heal the sick, etc. Folks are astounded during the act, but a few weeks later, their lives have muddied the waters and it isn&#8217;t so clear that it wasn&#8217;t just incredible chance. Here&#8217;s a bit from my book,<br />
 Quantum 1004 50 2008 Magic (I&#8217;ll be publishing soon):</p>
<p>The Seeding</p>
<p>On October 4, 1957 the Soviet Union launched the first of humanity&#8217;s machines to reach my realm. Sputnik means &#8220;co-traveler&#8221; so I hitched a ride and waited 92 days to plummet to Earth on the burning Star of Sputnik exactly 9 months before I was born on October 4, 1958. I entered the developing egg of a random woman and waited.</p>
<p>So&#8230;a new player arrives on the field. 92 is such an important number&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mewho</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/02/20/defending-thomas/#comment-16514</link>
		<dc:creator>mewho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=743#comment-16514</guid>
		<description>Appreciate it.  Thanks.  All thought-provoking and respectable.  I've discovered this to be more of a journey, anyway, so I'm constantly reconsidering viewpoints.  Yours is insightful.  I'll probably see you on another post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciate it.  Thanks.  All thought-provoking and respectable.  I&#8217;ve discovered this to be more of a journey, anyway, so I&#8217;m constantly reconsidering viewpoints.  Yours is insightful.  I&#8217;ll probably see you on another post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/02/20/defending-thomas/#comment-16498</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=743#comment-16498</guid>
		<description>James,

"When you say that you are skeptical of the church, what do you mean?"

I was not raised in the church, and most of my experience with it before becoming a Christian was not all that great.  I'm sometimes critical of the church (as a whole, or many Christians in general), because we have dropped the ball on a lot of things... making battles of things that need not be (both within and outside the church), and generally not loving the world like we are called to do.  I also have a great hope for the church to be what God desires it to be: a people who live their lives in such a way that it brings blessing and love to all the nations of the world.

"Are you skeptical about these same matters?"

Yes and no... (Hehe, as a musician myself, I HEAR you on the need to have some decent music...)  I have absolutely no problem accepting that we are biologically "wired" for all the things you mention.  None at all.  But instead of seeing it as proof against authentic experience, I see it as God wiring us in such a way as to provide natural means to connect to Him.  The important part is where we direct those means (i.e. to Him instead of to ourselves a la "spiritualism," or towards escape a la buddhism, etc.).  This opens us, practically, as an act of submission and trust for Him to do supernatural work in our hearts.  Because God created us, and our world, it just makes sense that He would use many of the designs He put in place to take care of us.  But He doesn't HAVE to.

That said, I am skeptical when Christians say that we must worship/pray/meditate THIS way or THAT way.  God wired us all similarly but differently, and would say that this is an excellent foundation from which to explore relationship with God.  For example, I'm sometimes mildly ADD (which is why I love blogging).  I can't sit down and pray.  I have to be walking.  I prefer to hike up a massive hill, or something equally physically strenuous.  But that doesn't make my prayer any lower quality, or any less heard.  God works through that.

"I like the rituals and stimuli provided by religion, but am whole-heartedly skeptical about all of the supernatural pronouncements."

To be honest, I am sometimes as well... I mean, it's HARD to believe it sometimes.  It's just not as easy to verify because it is irregular (hence "super"-natural).  But then there are times when God comes out of left field and I have no other explanation (and not for lack of searching).

"I was a minister for ten years of my life, and now I can’t stand to hear the Roman Road (it’s an old gospel tract that led you through the book of Romans)."

Puke.  I don't blame you.  When handed a tract, I would argue with the person for sheer entertainment.  It's sad and amusing all at the same time.   

"Preaching Hell is really, really repulsive and unattractive to me..."

Hell is the one thing I wish weren't in the Bible... but it is.  And while I can't ignore it, it is also not a tool for guilt-tripping people into believing in a God that joyously sends you there unless you get your sh*t together.  Christians should not preach Hell, they should preach Grace.

That said, Hell is fundamental to understanding Grace (what is grace if we do not need it?).  But the basis for our faith should not be fear, but love.  I know it sounds like I'm mincing words, but it is a HUGELY important distinctive...  I'd love to go into more detail on this, but I think it would take a lot more time and thought on my part to do it justice.  

Does that answer your questions?  I can definitely relate to where you are coming from.  Thanks for the conversation, bro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>&#8220;When you say that you are skeptical of the church, what do you mean?&#8221;</p>
<p>I was not raised in the church, and most of my experience with it before becoming a Christian was not all that great.  I&#8217;m sometimes critical of the church (as a whole, or many Christians in general), because we have dropped the ball on a lot of things&#8230; making battles of things that need not be (both within and outside the church), and generally not loving the world like we are called to do.  I also have a great hope for the church to be what God desires it to be: a people who live their lives in such a way that it brings blessing and love to all the nations of the world.</p>
<p>&#8220;Are you skeptical about these same matters?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes and no&#8230; (Hehe, as a musician myself, I HEAR you on the need to have some decent music&#8230 <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I have absolutely no problem accepting that we are biologically &#8220;wired&#8221; for all the things you mention.  None at all.  But instead of seeing it as proof against authentic experience, I see it as God wiring us in such a way as to provide natural means to connect to Him.  The important part is where we direct those means (i.e. to Him instead of to ourselves a la &#8220;spiritualism,&#8221; or towards escape a la buddhism, etc.).  This opens us, practically, as an act of submission and trust for Him to do supernatural work in our hearts.  Because God created us, and our world, it just makes sense that He would use many of the designs He put in place to take care of us.  But He doesn&#8217;t HAVE to.</p>
<p>That said, I am skeptical when Christians say that we must worship/pray/meditate THIS way or THAT way.  God wired us all similarly but differently, and would say that this is an excellent foundation from which to explore relationship with God.  For example, I&#8217;m sometimes mildly ADD (which is why I love blogging).  I can&#8217;t sit down and pray.  I have to be walking.  I prefer to hike up a massive hill, or something equally physically strenuous.  But that doesn&#8217;t make my prayer any lower quality, or any less heard.  God works through that.</p>
<p>&#8220;I like the rituals and stimuli provided by religion, but am whole-heartedly skeptical about all of the supernatural pronouncements.&#8221;</p>
<p>To be honest, I am sometimes as well&#8230; I mean, it&#8217;s HARD to believe it sometimes.  It&#8217;s just not as easy to verify because it is irregular (hence &#8220;super&#8221;-natural).  But then there are times when God comes out of left field and I have no other explanation (and not for lack of searching).</p>
<p>&#8220;I was a minister for ten years of my life, and now I can’t stand to hear the Roman Road (it’s an old gospel tract that led you through the book of Romans).&#8221;</p>
<p>Puke.  I don&#8217;t blame you.  When handed a tract, I would argue with the person for sheer entertainment.  It&#8217;s sad and amusing all at the same time.   </p>
<p>&#8220;Preaching Hell is really, really repulsive and unattractive to me&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Hell is the one thing I wish weren&#8217;t in the Bible&#8230; but it is.  And while I can&#8217;t ignore it, it is also not a tool for guilt-tripping people into believing in a God that joyously sends you there unless you get your sh*t together.  Christians should not preach Hell, they should preach Grace.</p>
<p>That said, Hell is fundamental to understanding Grace (what is grace if we do not need it?).  But the basis for our faith should not be fear, but love.  I know it sounds like I&#8217;m mincing words, but it is a HUGELY important distinctive&#8230;  I&#8217;d love to go into more detail on this, but I think it would take a lot more time and thought on my part to do it justice.  </p>
<p>Does that answer your questions?  I can definitely relate to where you are coming from.  Thanks for the conversation, bro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mewho</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/02/20/defending-thomas/#comment-16497</link>
		<dc:creator>mewho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=743#comment-16497</guid>
		<description>Brad,

When you say that you are skeptical of the church, what do you mean?  As a skeptic, do you doubt your salvation?  What are you skeptical about?  Also (because you seem intelligent and I devour these conversations of faith) what church are you referring to?

I am very aware of  a need I have for the things the church offers (Christian).  I need the community.  I need the enlightening that comes through worship (our church has the whole buffet of instruments and I'm a music major who won't go to a piano/hymn church ever again.)  I need the time in "prayer", and the connection that church brings to my childhood and family.  I really don't mind going to church at all.  In fact, I rather like it.  (Sunday mornings is enough for me, though.)

With all that said, I don't BELIEVE ONE WORD of the supernatural claims made by the pastor.   Last Sunday's sermon was a "Salvation Sermon", and I tuned it out, read the footnotes in my study Bible, and entertained myself after the music was over.  I think the Biblical claims of afterlife, original sin, the Garden of Eden are ALL Ancient musings with NO TRUTH.  I take the Bible's claims as God's Word as FALSE.  No book on earth was authored by God.  People can say otherwise, and the book itself might say it, but I don't believe it.

I think there IS something about our brains, however, that need the things that only religion provides at this point in the brief history of mankind.  Daniel Dennett and Sam Harris are BOTH respectors of religion to that extent.  Religions DO provide for people elements that make our brains "happier".  To hear them speak, or to read their books, you find that Dennett and Harris both admit that religions do have elements to them that satisfy some deep needs that we all have, but that religions' claims to metaphysical truths beyond the natural world are myth.  For example, prayer/meditation is deeply imbedded in the need for our brains to procees our thoughts, music is emotionally satisfying, community satisfies the need to "fit in".  These are human needs satisfied by religion's rituals and features, not by it's doctrines.  And the religion of your father will do just fine, in most cases.

Are you skeptical about these same matters?  I'm just curious, because I may be more like you than I think.  I'm not trying to be provacative.  I like the rituals and stimuli provided by religion, but am whole-heartedly skeptical about all of the supernatural pronouncements.  I was a minister for ten years of my life, and now I can't stand to hear the Roman Road (it's an old gospel tract that led you through the book of Romans).  Preaching Hell is really, really repulsive and unattractive to me, and it's all I can do to sit through when someone starts in on it.  Would love to hear your thoughts.

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad,</p>
<p>When you say that you are skeptical of the church, what do you mean?  As a skeptic, do you doubt your salvation?  What are you skeptical about?  Also (because you seem intelligent and I devour these conversations of faith) what church are you referring to?</p>
<p>I am very aware of  a need I have for the things the church offers (Christian).  I need the community.  I need the enlightening that comes through worship (our church has the whole buffet of instruments and I&#8217;m a music major who won&#8217;t go to a piano/hymn church ever again.)  I need the time in &#8220;prayer&#8221;, and the connection that church brings to my childhood and family.  I really don&#8217;t mind going to church at all.  In fact, I rather like it.  (Sunday mornings is enough for me, though.)</p>
<p>With all that said, I don&#8217;t BELIEVE ONE WORD of the supernatural claims made by the pastor.   Last Sunday&#8217;s sermon was a &#8220;Salvation Sermon&#8221;, and I tuned it out, read the footnotes in my study Bible, and entertained myself after the music was over.  I think the Biblical claims of afterlife, original sin, the Garden of Eden are ALL Ancient musings with NO TRUTH.  I take the Bible&#8217;s claims as God&#8217;s Word as FALSE.  No book on earth was authored by God.  People can say otherwise, and the book itself might say it, but I don&#8217;t believe it.</p>
<p>I think there IS something about our brains, however, that need the things that only religion provides at this point in the brief history of mankind.  Daniel Dennett and Sam Harris are BOTH respectors of religion to that extent.  Religions DO provide for people elements that make our brains &#8220;happier&#8221;.  To hear them speak, or to read their books, you find that Dennett and Harris both admit that religions do have elements to them that satisfy some deep needs that we all have, but that religions&#8217; claims to metaphysical truths beyond the natural world are myth.  For example, prayer/meditation is deeply imbedded in the need for our brains to procees our thoughts, music is emotionally satisfying, community satisfies the need to &#8220;fit in&#8221;.  These are human needs satisfied by religion&#8217;s rituals and features, not by it&#8217;s doctrines.  And the religion of your father will do just fine, in most cases.</p>
<p>Are you skeptical about these same matters?  I&#8217;m just curious, because I may be more like you than I think.  I&#8217;m not trying to be provacative.  I like the rituals and stimuli provided by religion, but am whole-heartedly skeptical about all of the supernatural pronouncements.  I was a minister for ten years of my life, and now I can&#8217;t stand to hear the Roman Road (it&#8217;s an old gospel tract that led you through the book of Romans).  Preaching Hell is really, really repulsive and unattractive to me, and it&#8217;s all I can do to sit through when someone starts in on it.  Would love to hear your thoughts.</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/02/20/defending-thomas/#comment-16492</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=743#comment-16492</guid>
		<description>"...but be careful of the one-trick-pony, because anybody can ride it."

Absolutely.  When I say that "we Christians CAN be a one-trick-pony," it is because these experiences have meant a lot to us (as yours has for you).  It is easy to relate something that we have directly experienced.

That said, it is not to the exclusion of rational (and even a degree of skeptical) analysis.  I am a skeptic (believe it or not).  I am VERY skeptical of the church, sometimes to a fault.  But like with most things in life, too much of a good thing can be bad.  He who sees through everything sees nothing at all, and is in fact as blind as the person he claims to see more than.

It is not my experience alone that informs and strengthens my faith, but a rational belief that the bible explains the 5 w's (who, what, where, when, how, and why) better than anything I have come across.  This is supplemented and confirmed by my experience, a la Augustine's statement that "I believe in order to know."

Check out "Science and Faith" by C. John Collins.  The Christian faith need not be so diametrically opposed with the rest of the world as many would think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;but be careful of the one-trick-pony, because anybody can ride it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely.  When I say that &#8220;we Christians CAN be a one-trick-pony,&#8221; it is because these experiences have meant a lot to us (as yours has for you).  It is easy to relate something that we have directly experienced.</p>
<p>That said, it is not to the exclusion of rational (and even a degree of skeptical) analysis.  I am a skeptic (believe it or not).  I am VERY skeptical of the church, sometimes to a fault.  But like with most things in life, too much of a good thing can be bad.  He who sees through everything sees nothing at all, and is in fact as blind as the person he claims to see more than.</p>
<p>It is not my experience alone that informs and strengthens my faith, but a rational belief that the bible explains the 5 w&#8217;s (who, what, where, when, how, and why) better than anything I have come across.  This is supplemented and confirmed by my experience, a la Augustine&#8217;s statement that &#8220;I believe in order to know.&#8221;</p>
<p>Check out &#8220;Science and Faith&#8221; by C. John Collins.  The Christian faith need not be so diametrically opposed with the rest of the world as many would think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeoPardus</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/02/20/defending-thomas/#comment-16490</link>
		<dc:creator>LeoPardus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=743#comment-16490</guid>
		<description>Brad:

Monkey lover eh? Well I see it's time for me to set you straight again, guano breath. :)

First my story: You can read it at the de-conversion forum site.  Link is:  http://www.de-conversion.org/news.php?readmore=19

&lt;i&gt;Also, assuming that there is an omnipotent and benevolent God (work with me here), who we have also chosen to reject/distrust/rebel from, does it not strike you as a little ridiculous to make that kind of demand from Him?&lt;/i&gt;

I would partially agree. We wouldn't be in a great position to make demands. On the other hand, I at least would need something to convince me of that god's existence. After that, the rest wouldn't be so hard. Minus that, the rest means nothing.

&lt;i&gt; Assuming that scripture is true (again, work with me), it strikes me that He’s done a helluva lot for us already.&lt;/i&gt;

I'll grant that. 

&lt;i&gt;people have been dramatically changed by God. I’ve seen them, and am one personally.&lt;/i&gt;

Entirely true. You know though, that people have also been changed by Alcoholics Anonymous, Islam, Buddhism, de-conversion (as attested by mewho here, and by others on this blog and elsewhere), by the birth of their child, by the death of a loved one, by getting an education, by serving hard prison time, and so forth.

I'm once again pasting in something Karen wrote about this topic because she put it so concisely and well:

&lt;i&gt;"“The bible tells us that Christians who believe in Jesus and have received the Holy Spirit have access to God’s guidance, comfort and presence. If that’s true, it seems to me that there should be some way to detect that special influence in individual lives and in the corporate “life” of the church and history of Christianity. After all, people who have a member of the trinity living in their hearts should manifest that at least somewhat consistently - right?
And yet it seems like the history of the church, and the individual lives of believers, bears no distinctive stamp of that indwelling of the Holy Spirit. The atrocities, the horrors, the corruption, the wars fought in the name of Christ, the individual selfishness, suffering, immorality - where’s the divine spark that separates Christians from followers of other religions, or from non-believers?
I don’t see it. There are great churches doing good, and great individual believers living sacrificial lives. There are also great secular organizations doing much good, and great atheists living sacrificial lives. There’s not a pervasive difference that I can see, and it seems if the promises of the NT are true, there should be.”&lt;/i&gt;

This is strong evidence to me that there's no reality behind the idea of "god's indwelling spirit". And if that isn't real, then we really are all "on our own", and really are just "making it up as we go along". That explanation lines up a lot better with the reality I observe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad:</p>
<p>Monkey lover eh? Well I see it&#8217;s time for me to set you straight again, guano breath. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>First my story: You can read it at the de-conversion forum site.  Link is:  <a href="http://www.de-conversion.org/news.php?readmore=19" rel="nofollow">http://www.de-conversion.org/news.php?readmore=19</a></p>
<p><i>Also, assuming that there is an omnipotent and benevolent God (work with me here), who we have also chosen to reject/distrust/rebel from, does it not strike you as a little ridiculous to make that kind of demand from Him?</i></p>
<p>I would partially agree. We wouldn&#8217;t be in a great position to make demands. On the other hand, I at least would need something to convince me of that god&#8217;s existence. After that, the rest wouldn&#8217;t be so hard. Minus that, the rest means nothing.</p>
<p><i> Assuming that scripture is true (again, work with me), it strikes me that He’s done a helluva lot for us already.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll grant that. </p>
<p><i>people have been dramatically changed by God. I’ve seen them, and am one personally.</i></p>
<p>Entirely true. You know though, that people have also been changed by Alcoholics Anonymous, Islam, Buddhism, de-conversion (as attested by mewho here, and by others on this blog and elsewhere), by the birth of their child, by the death of a loved one, by getting an education, by serving hard prison time, and so forth.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m once again pasting in something Karen wrote about this topic because she put it so concisely and well:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;“The bible tells us that Christians who believe in Jesus and have received the Holy Spirit have access to God’s guidance, comfort and presence. If that’s true, it seems to me that there should be some way to detect that special influence in individual lives and in the corporate “life” of the church and history of Christianity. After all, people who have a member of the trinity living in their hearts should manifest that at least somewhat consistently - right?<br />
And yet it seems like the history of the church, and the individual lives of believers, bears no distinctive stamp of that indwelling of the Holy Spirit. The atrocities, the horrors, the corruption, the wars fought in the name of Christ, the individual selfishness, suffering, immorality - where’s the divine spark that separates Christians from followers of other religions, or from non-believers?<br />
I don’t see it. There are great churches doing good, and great individual believers living sacrificial lives. There are also great secular organizations doing much good, and great atheists living sacrificial lives. There’s not a pervasive difference that I can see, and it seems if the promises of the NT are true, there should be.”</i></p>
<p>This is strong evidence to me that there&#8217;s no reality behind the idea of &#8220;god&#8217;s indwelling spirit&#8221;. And if that isn&#8217;t real, then we really are all &#8220;on our own&#8221;, and really are just &#8220;making it up as we go along&#8221;. That explanation lines up a lot better with the reality I observe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mewho</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/02/20/defending-thomas/#comment-16487</link>
		<dc:creator>mewho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=743#comment-16487</guid>
		<description>Brad,

I'd like to comment on your "one-trick-pony", if you don't mind.  It really IS the one thing that every Christian can claim:  "Giving my life to Christ Changed my Life".  The personal testimony.  Impossible to refute, designed to be protected from ALL skepticism.  You're right.  Atheists cannot criticize what you feel your belief has done in your life.  It is out of the reach of EVERYONE, including other Christians.  No one can get inside your head to say it hasn't happened.  And there are probably things that you do better now that you're a Christian.  There are observable "fruits".  However...

The claim can be also made by de-converting to Atheism.  A lack of belief in any of the supernatural has helped me take this life much more seriously.  I look at other people now with much MORE compassion than I ever did as a Christian.  The pain we ALL experience is tragic, and when life turns sour, the ache of despair is very, very real.  There are many other WONDERFUL changes I have felt, though, that have lifted me above a very narrow, privileged lense to a much more embracing vantage-point.  I love this world and the life that fills it.  We may be alone in the universe with a planet so amazing.   I won't say that all of the changes have all been good, but be careful of the one-trick-pony, because anybody can ride it.  That would include Mormons, Muslims and Buddhists, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to comment on your &#8220;one-trick-pony&#8221;, if you don&#8217;t mind.  It really IS the one thing that every Christian can claim:  &#8220;Giving my life to Christ Changed my Life&#8221;.  The personal testimony.  Impossible to refute, designed to be protected from ALL skepticism.  You&#8217;re right.  Atheists cannot criticize what you feel your belief has done in your life.  It is out of the reach of EVERYONE, including other Christians.  No one can get inside your head to say it hasn&#8217;t happened.  And there are probably things that you do better now that you&#8217;re a Christian.  There are observable &#8220;fruits&#8221;.  However&#8230;</p>
<p>The claim can be also made by de-converting to Atheism.  A lack of belief in any of the supernatural has helped me take this life much more seriously.  I look at other people now with much MORE compassion than I ever did as a Christian.  The pain we ALL experience is tragic, and when life turns sour, the ache of despair is very, very real.  There are many other WONDERFUL changes I have felt, though, that have lifted me above a very narrow, privileged lense to a much more embracing vantage-point.  I love this world and the life that fills it.  We may be alone in the universe with a planet so amazing.   I won&#8217;t say that all of the changes have all been good, but be careful of the one-trick-pony, because anybody can ride it.  That would include Mormons, Muslims and Buddhists, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
