<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should we challenge every theistic argument?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://de-conversion.com/2008/03/31/ways-and-means/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/03/31/ways-and-means/</link>
	<description>Resources for skeptical, de-converting, or former Christians......</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:51:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: exevangel</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/03/31/ways-and-means/#comment-18228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[exevangel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=796#comment-18228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw a fantastic talk by a nun who works on interfaith issues and she noted that Christians and Muslims are the sole theists who try to convert people, that other theists not only don&#039;t try to convert people but they even can resist converts (Judaism in particular).  My view is definitely one of &quot;to each his own&quot; and I don&#039;t want people trying to convert me but I also try not to convert others to my viewpoint either.  Having been raised a Christian I admit I find this tough and I do sometimes slip and catch myself!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a fantastic talk by a nun who works on interfaith issues and she noted that Christians and Muslims are the sole theists who try to convert people, that other theists not only don&#8217;t try to convert people but they even can resist converts (Judaism in particular).  My view is definitely one of &#8220;to each his own&#8221; and I don&#8217;t want people trying to convert me but I also try not to convert others to my viewpoint either.  Having been raised a Christian I admit I find this tough and I do sometimes slip and catch myself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garg the Unzola</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/03/31/ways-and-means/#comment-18172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garg the Unzola]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=796#comment-18172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being an anti-theist is not constructive. The point of freedom of speech and freedom of thought is that you allow people freedom. Whether everyone is smart or responsible enough to use that freedom is a different matter entirely, but forcing people to abdicate their belief systems is crossing the line. There are many people who enrich their lives with superstitions, and they are free to do so as long as their freedoms do not infringe on other people&#039;s freedoms. For instance, the film the Golden Compass invited much criticism from religious circles. I feel the film and the source books were carefully crafted opinions on religious matters without being vigilante or fanatic. I also feel the Christian protesters were voicing their opinion with decorum, even if I do think they were wrong. So no harm done. Contrast this with the Islamic extremist reaction to Danish cartoons.. this is not acceptable. It is not admirable to kill someone for your beliefs, or theirs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being an anti-theist is not constructive. The point of freedom of speech and freedom of thought is that you allow people freedom. Whether everyone is smart or responsible enough to use that freedom is a different matter entirely, but forcing people to abdicate their belief systems is crossing the line. There are many people who enrich their lives with superstitions, and they are free to do so as long as their freedoms do not infringe on other people&#8217;s freedoms. For instance, the film the Golden Compass invited much criticism from religious circles. I feel the film and the source books were carefully crafted opinions on religious matters without being vigilante or fanatic. I also feel the Christian protesters were voicing their opinion with decorum, even if I do think they were wrong. So no harm done. Contrast this with the Islamic extremist reaction to Danish cartoons.. this is not acceptable. It is not admirable to kill someone for your beliefs, or theirs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cthulhu</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/03/31/ways-and-means/#comment-17996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cthulhu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=796#comment-17996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#14 karen

&lt;i&gt;it reinforces their persecution complex&lt;/i&gt;

Excellent point - wish I had thought of that.  People who berate and belittle tend to put most other folks on the defensive.  It closes minds instead of opening them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#14 karen</p>
<p><i>it reinforces their persecution complex</i></p>
<p>Excellent point &#8211; wish I had thought of that.  People who berate and belittle tend to put most other folks on the defensive.  It closes minds instead of opening them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/03/31/ways-and-means/#comment-17980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[karen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=796#comment-17980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;So, when you act like a strident — which is to say, angry, aggressive, militant, insulting — atheist, what do you do? Do you tend to confirm, or disconfirm their internal stereotype? In fact, I think this behavior just reinforces the us-vs-them circle that conservative religionists live inside of.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Exactly. And it reinforces their persecution complex, too, which is a powerful tool particularly for fundamentalists and End Times believers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So, when you act like a strident — which is to say, angry, aggressive, militant, insulting — atheist, what do you do? Do you tend to confirm, or disconfirm their internal stereotype? In fact, I think this behavior just reinforces the us-vs-them circle that conservative religionists live inside of.</p></blockquote>
<p>Exactly. And it reinforces their persecution complex, too, which is a powerful tool particularly for fundamentalists and End Times believers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cthulhu</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/03/31/ways-and-means/#comment-17965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cthulhu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=796#comment-17965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard,

&lt;i&gt;My nonChristian friends accepted me for who I was, religion and all, despite my being an annoying uptight little neurotic twerp. *That* made an impact.&lt;/i&gt;

Exactly!

Quester,

&lt;i&gt;There is no over-arching “atheist agenda” to be productive toward, after all.&lt;/i&gt;

I agree - while I believe that there are areas we must be vocal and fight for - like teaching evolution and keeping religion (even in the disguise of ID) out of our schools, a civil attitude does more to change minds than berating someone for their beliefs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p><i>My nonChristian friends accepted me for who I was, religion and all, despite my being an annoying uptight little neurotic twerp. *That* made an impact.</i></p>
<p>Exactly!</p>
<p>Quester,</p>
<p><i>There is no over-arching “atheist agenda” to be productive toward, after all.</i></p>
<p>I agree &#8211; while I believe that there are areas we must be vocal and fight for &#8211; like teaching evolution and keeping religion (even in the disguise of ID) out of our schools, a civil attitude does more to change minds than berating someone for their beliefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quester</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/03/31/ways-and-means/#comment-17942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quester]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 05:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=796#comment-17942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;A question…do you find the stridency of many atheists to be counter-productive?&lt;/i&gt;

Depends what goal they&#039;re trying to produce. Are they trying to change minds, or vent emotion? There is no over-arching &quot;atheist agenda&quot; to be productive toward, after all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>A question…do you find the stridency of many atheists to be counter-productive?</i></p>
<p>Depends what goal they&#8217;re trying to produce. Are they trying to change minds, or vent emotion? There is no over-arching &#8220;atheist agenda&#8221; to be productive toward, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/03/31/ways-and-means/#comment-17940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=796#comment-17940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cthulhu-

&quot;A question…do you find the stridency of many atheists to be counter-productive?&quot;

A thousand times yes. I think it is *dramatically* counter-productive and probably does far more damage than had they just ignored religion altogether.

Evangelical believers already have a whole slew of internal caricatures about nonbelievers -- in a nutshell, that we are angry, spiteful, prideful people who hate all that is true and good.  Thats what it means to be a sinner.  In particular, we hate &quot;true&quot; Christians because they are the Light and remind us of our sin and guilt before God.

So, when you act like a strident -- which is to say, angry, aggressive, militant, insulting -- atheist, what do you do?  Do you tend to confirm, or disconfirm their internal stereotype?  In fact, I think this behavior just reinforces the us-vs-them circle that conservative religionists live inside of.

As I said in #5, the only thing that got through to me was having direct, behavioral experience with nonbelievers.  My nonChristian friends accepted me for who I was, religion and all, despite my being an annoying uptight little neurotic twerp.  *That* made an impact.  *That* wasnt supposed to happen.  Had, however, they ridiculed me for my beliefs, it would only have served to confirm my expectations, and they would not have stayed my friends, and that circle would be unbroken.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cthulhu-</p>
<p>&#8220;A question…do you find the stridency of many atheists to be counter-productive?&#8221;</p>
<p>A thousand times yes. I think it is *dramatically* counter-productive and probably does far more damage than had they just ignored religion altogether.</p>
<p>Evangelical believers already have a whole slew of internal caricatures about nonbelievers &#8212; in a nutshell, that we are angry, spiteful, prideful people who hate all that is true and good.  Thats what it means to be a sinner.  In particular, we hate &#8220;true&#8221; Christians because they are the Light and remind us of our sin and guilt before God.</p>
<p>So, when you act like a strident &#8212; which is to say, angry, aggressive, militant, insulting &#8212; atheist, what do you do?  Do you tend to confirm, or disconfirm their internal stereotype?  In fact, I think this behavior just reinforces the us-vs-them circle that conservative religionists live inside of.</p>
<p>As I said in #5, the only thing that got through to me was having direct, behavioral experience with nonbelievers.  My nonChristian friends accepted me for who I was, religion and all, despite my being an annoying uptight little neurotic twerp.  *That* made an impact.  *That* wasnt supposed to happen.  Had, however, they ridiculed me for my beliefs, it would only have served to confirm my expectations, and they would not have stayed my friends, and that circle would be unbroken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/03/31/ways-and-means/#comment-17939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=796#comment-17939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;To just barge in as an anti-theist and ridicule or insult doesn’t do any good for the cause of rationality; indeed, it undermines it. &quot;

And not just rationality - discourse itself.  After all, when someone accuses you of being blatantly irrational, how does that affect you?  Does it make you think, &quot;holy cow, you&#039;re right! I *am* being just stupidly irrational! Thanks for pointing it out!&quot;  Or does it just make you defensive?

We humans like to see ourselves as reasonable and competent.  When you challenge a set of beliefs in a way that makes people feel irrational and stupid, you will invariably just engage their defenses.  Even if they might otherwise have been convinced they were mistaken, now it has become about maintaining self-esteem and self-image.  I suspect this is half the motivation behind most apologetics.


&quot;However, while I was immersed in Christianity, I was able to willfully ignore that contradiction or explain away that dichotomy in my head. &quot;

Me too. And FYI, sociologists would call this the presence of a  &quot;plausibility structure.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;To just barge in as an anti-theist and ridicule or insult doesn’t do any good for the cause of rationality; indeed, it undermines it. &#8221;</p>
<p>And not just rationality &#8211; discourse itself.  After all, when someone accuses you of being blatantly irrational, how does that affect you?  Does it make you think, &#8220;holy cow, you&#8217;re right! I *am* being just stupidly irrational! Thanks for pointing it out!&#8221;  Or does it just make you defensive?</p>
<p>We humans like to see ourselves as reasonable and competent.  When you challenge a set of beliefs in a way that makes people feel irrational and stupid, you will invariably just engage their defenses.  Even if they might otherwise have been convinced they were mistaken, now it has become about maintaining self-esteem and self-image.  I suspect this is half the motivation behind most apologetics.</p>
<p>&#8220;However, while I was immersed in Christianity, I was able to willfully ignore that contradiction or explain away that dichotomy in my head. &#8221;</p>
<p>Me too. And FYI, sociologists would call this the presence of a  &#8220;plausibility structure.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cthulhu</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/03/31/ways-and-means/#comment-17937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cthulhu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 03:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=796#comment-17937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Questor,

A question...do you find the stridency of many atheists to be counter-productive?  I find myself somewhat put off by this and think the attitude of say, Richard Muse, to be far more profitable.  In my opinion, the caustic attitude displayed by many make changing peoples minds about rational thinking much more difficult.  As all here probably know, critical self examination can be very difficult and being told how stupid you are doesn&#039;t seem very helpful to me.  I welcome others opinion here...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Questor,</p>
<p>A question&#8230;do you find the stridency of many atheists to be counter-productive?  I find myself somewhat put off by this and think the attitude of say, Richard Muse, to be far more profitable.  In my opinion, the caustic attitude displayed by many make changing peoples minds about rational thinking much more difficult.  As all here probably know, critical self examination can be very difficult and being told how stupid you are doesn&#8217;t seem very helpful to me.  I welcome others opinion here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quester</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2008/03/31/ways-and-means/#comment-17934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quester]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=796#comment-17934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, Stephen. I had apparently become too enamoured of my own analogy to clearly get my actual meaning across. My thanks to The de-Convert for the skilled editing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Stephen. I had apparently become too enamoured of my own analogy to clearly get my actual meaning across. My thanks to The de-Convert for the skilled editing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

