Comments on: Why d-C? – Logical Problems with the Dogma http://de-conversion.com/2008/05/27/why-d-c-2-logical-problems-with-the-dogma/ Resources for skeptical, de-converting, or former Christians...... Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:35:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Annougs http://de-conversion.com/2008/05/27/why-d-c-2-logical-problems-with-the-dogma/#comment-28175 Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:53:42 +0000 http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=831#comment-28175 Подскажите шооблончег под WordPress 2.6.2, чтобы был похож на ваш de-conversion.com.

Заранее благодарю)

]]> By: 7 Reasons why Christians de-convert « de-conversion http://de-conversion.com/2008/05/27/why-d-c-2-logical-problems-with-the-dogma/#comment-21377 Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:32:44 +0000 http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=831#comment-21377 [...] Why d-C? (2) Logical Problems with the Dogma [...]

]]> By: Why d-C? (4) - The Hypocritical Churches « de-conversion http://de-conversion.com/2008/05/27/why-d-c-2-logical-problems-with-the-dogma/#comment-20015 Sat, 07 Jun 2008 23:02:17 +0000 http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=831#comment-20015 [...] who read the bible did so through the lens of the preachers words and were thus immune from realising it’s faults, and that religions would have all the answers to the really simple questions down pat. I mean, [...]

]]> By: Why d-C? (3) The Bible Killed My Faith « de-conversion http://de-conversion.com/2008/05/27/why-d-c-2-logical-problems-with-the-dogma/#comment-19721 Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:17:33 +0000 http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=831#comment-19721 [...] To date, we’ve discussed Why d-C? (1) Answer the damn question Mr. Priest! and Why d-C? (2) Logical Problems with the Dogma. [...]

]]> By: Cthulhu http://de-conversion.com/2008/05/27/why-d-c-2-logical-problems-with-the-dogma/#comment-19641 Thu, 29 May 2008 19:27:05 +0000 http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=831#comment-19641 Another favorite contradiction…

How did Judas die?

Matthew 27:5 – And he [Judas] cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself.

Acts 1:18 – Now this man [Judas] purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.

Source: http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/judas.html

]]> By: Cthulhu http://de-conversion.com/2008/05/27/why-d-c-2-logical-problems-with-the-dogma/#comment-19631 Thu, 29 May 2008 13:54:26 +0000 http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=831#comment-19631 LeoPardus,

Great idea for an article! One of my personal favorites…

How about – When did Jesus actually ascend into heaven???

Luke Chap. 24, Mark Chap. 16 – day of resurrection.

John Chap. 20 – 8 days after resurrection.

Acts Chap. 13 – ‘many’ days after resurrection.

Acts Chap. 1 – 40 days after resurrection.

Source: http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/ascend.html

]]> By: TheNerd http://de-conversion.com/2008/05/27/why-d-c-2-logical-problems-with-the-dogma/#comment-19621 Thu, 29 May 2008 01:46:14 +0000 http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=831#comment-19621 Wait… Yurka… you’re directing me to a Bible Commentary?

“and he sat in the tent door, in the heat of the day;” partly to cool and refresh himself, and partly to observe if any passengers passed by, to invite them in; this being a time of day when such needed refreshment, and it was proper for them to lie by a while, and not proceed on their journey until it was cooler: or rather to or “near” the tent door, as Noldius {g}, or before it, without or under the shade of the tree, after mentioned.

Forget using your own mind – just read this book, and you will know what God REALLY meant to say in the Bible!

If you are seriously referring me to a commentary to tell me that the literal meaning of the Bible is wrong, then you are not helping your cause, Yurka. You are just fueling the argument against the Bible being God’s word. If he was serious about making his will known, he wouldn’t have written it in code, waiting for that one perfect moment when 2000 years later someone would finally come along and tell everyone what he REALLY meant.

Please, next time you disagree that the Bible is way too open to personal interpretation and subject to the prejudices of the listener, don’t direct us to one man’s personal interpretation of the Bible, as your defending evidence for it’s universal authority.

-Andrea [for some reason I am signed in under different names on different computers, but if you look to the face on the right, it's still me :) ]

]]> By: Obi http://de-conversion.com/2008/05/27/why-d-c-2-logical-problems-with-the-dogma/#comment-19620 Thu, 29 May 2008 00:20:54 +0000 http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=831#comment-19620 Haha, I think not. In fact, “I think not” means I can think for myself (which is key here), so I don’t need a “Bible commentary” to tell me what I should think about the Bible. It’s all written plainly in the Bible for everyone to see already, and if you truly open your mind and question it, you’ll come to the same conclusion that all of us de-converts have.

]]> By: Yurka http://de-conversion.com/2008/05/27/why-d-c-2-logical-problems-with-the-dogma/#comment-19619 Wed, 28 May 2008 22:14:35 +0000 http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=831#comment-19619 Cavils… cavils. Andrea, Obi, why don’t you refer to a Bible commentary (such as Gills: http://freegrace.net/gill ) rather than following the pied pardus?

]]> By: LeoPardus http://de-conversion.com/2008/05/27/why-d-c-2-logical-problems-with-the-dogma/#comment-19614 Wed, 28 May 2008 19:26:10 +0000 http://agnosticatheism.wordpress.com/?p=831#comment-19614 Andrea and Obi have inspired me to contemplate a new article. I think I’ll call it, “Really whacked Bible contradictions”.

Y’all contribute right here in this thread and I’ll put ‘em together.

Of course which ones I finally pick and post will be determined by my own, infallible judgment. :)

]]>