<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skepticism vs. Faith</title>
	<atom:link href="http://de-conversion.com/2009/08/06/skepticism-vs-faith/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://de-conversion.com/2009/08/06/skepticism-vs-faith/</link>
	<description>Resources for skeptical, de-converting, or former Christians......</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:20:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: watch tv episodes online free</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2009/08/06/skepticism-vs-faith/#comment-76523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[watch tv episodes online free]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 03:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://de-conversion.com/?p=2995#comment-76523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s up to all, since I am in fact keen of reading this weblog&#039;s post to be updated regularly.
It carries fastidious data.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s up to all, since I am in fact keen of reading this weblog&#8217;s post to be updated regularly.<br />
It carries fastidious data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fatimah</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2009/08/06/skepticism-vs-faith/#comment-57322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fatimah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 05:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://de-conversion.com/?p=2995#comment-57322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I needed this today..we found out last week 7 days ago that my young, hehlaty, in shape, non-smoking, not overweight husband has lymphoma. To say we are devastated and terrified does not even begin to discribe our feelings. We have 2 children..did I mention I am 6 months pregnant. Please pray for my husband..our children, our family.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I needed this today..we found out last week 7 days ago that my young, hehlaty, in shape, non-smoking, not overweight husband has lymphoma. To say we are devastated and terrified does not even begin to discribe our feelings. We have 2 children..did I mention I am 6 months pregnant. Please pray for my husband..our children, our family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anti-supernaturalist</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2009/08/06/skepticism-vs-faith/#comment-36481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anti-supernaturalist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://de-conversion.com/?p=2995#comment-36481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Those not with us are against us.&lt;/i&gt; - Luke 11:23 NIV

 &lt;b&gt;The Big Lie of the Big-3 Monster-theisms:
Skeptics cannot undermine beliefs which require spiritual insight to believe!&lt;/b&gt;

The Big Lie exemplifies a classic logical failure called an &quot;immunizing strategy.&quot; Only a believer can understand another believer’s beliefs. It is a form of begging the question -- presupposing without proof the very point at issue.

An immunizing strategy amounts to deflecting away every request for reasoning &lt;i&gt;outside the charmed circle of language which only a believer could use.&lt;/i&gt;

But, one pays dearly when immunizing a belief from criticism. It cuts off rational communication. The immunizer gives up the right to be classed as a “reasonable person” — in the common sense way just by the courts.

You cannot respond rationally to critics by saying that only those who are with me can understand what I have to say. &lt;i&gt;There must be some starting point in a discourse common to believer and to critic. Otherwise, there&#039;s nothing that &lt;b&gt;can&lt;/b&gt; be talked about.&lt;/i&gt;

Now you know why a xian “conversion” sales job has always begun with purportedly “absurd” or &quot;paradoxical&quot; claims to induce belief. And to a rational ancient Greek nothing was more conceptually contradictory than a &quot;god on a cross.&quot;

Ultimately, xianity cannot be refuted; it can only be dismantled. The de-deification of culture (including the sciences) is our task for the next 100 years.

anti-supernaturalist]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Those not with us are against us.</i> &#8211; Luke 11:23 NIV</p>
<p> <b>The Big Lie of the Big-3 Monster-theisms:<br />
Skeptics cannot undermine beliefs which require spiritual insight to believe!</b></p>
<p>The Big Lie exemplifies a classic logical failure called an &#8220;immunizing strategy.&#8221; Only a believer can understand another believer’s beliefs. It is a form of begging the question &#8212; presupposing without proof the very point at issue.</p>
<p>An immunizing strategy amounts to deflecting away every request for reasoning <i>outside the charmed circle of language which only a believer could use.</i></p>
<p>But, one pays dearly when immunizing a belief from criticism. It cuts off rational communication. The immunizer gives up the right to be classed as a “reasonable person” — in the common sense way just by the courts.</p>
<p>You cannot respond rationally to critics by saying that only those who are with me can understand what I have to say. <i>There must be some starting point in a discourse common to believer and to critic. Otherwise, there&#8217;s nothing that <b>can</b> be talked about.</i></p>
<p>Now you know why a xian “conversion” sales job has always begun with purportedly “absurd” or &#8220;paradoxical&#8221; claims to induce belief. And to a rational ancient Greek nothing was more conceptually contradictory than a &#8220;god on a cross.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ultimately, xianity cannot be refuted; it can only be dismantled. The de-deification of culture (including the sciences) is our task for the next 100 years.</p>
<p>anti-supernaturalist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quester</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2009/08/06/skepticism-vs-faith/#comment-36202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quester]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://de-conversion.com/?p=2995#comment-36202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I commend anyone who tries to use reason to defend what they believe,&lt;/i&gt;

Ok, I can go with that. Good job in seeing the positive!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I commend anyone who tries to use reason to defend what they believe,</i></p>
<p>Ok, I can go with that. Good job in seeing the positive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2009/08/06/skepticism-vs-faith/#comment-36172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://de-conversion.com/?p=2995#comment-36172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Since both lead to a contradiction, either reason does not exist or God does not.&lt;/em&gt;

I should not have said &quot;reason does not exist&quot;, I should have said &quot;reason is useless with the things of God&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Since both lead to a contradiction, either reason does not exist or God does not.</em></p>
<p>I should not have said &#8220;reason does not exist&#8221;, I should have said &#8220;reason is useless with the things of God&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2009/08/06/skepticism-vs-faith/#comment-36171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://de-conversion.com/?p=2995#comment-36171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I commend anyone who tries to use reason to defend what they believe, because at least they realize the usefulness of reason and are opening themselves up to the standard that lead me - at least - to leaving faith altogether.

As soon as a person submits to the notion that reason should lead anyone back to their God - that reason gives glory to God - they are starting on the right track. No?

Sure, his logic is bad or non-existent, but at least he is starting on that path. But that is how I started, and look where I ended up! It&#039;s better than those who just believe and are afraid to use logic. I&#039;ve known plenty of people like that and they are walking contradictions - using reason whenever it is convenient and throwing it out whenever it comes to anything in their faith because &quot;God is above reason&quot;.

The trick is when someone finally realizes they cannot use reason to get the results they want, and instead they should accept the results of reason - where it leads.

Place reason above God and you will leave faith. Place God above reason and render theology meaningless. Since both lead to a contradiction, either reason does not exist or God does not. I can&#039;t see how anything else is possible.

Hopefully people like Anders reach that point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I commend anyone who tries to use reason to defend what they believe, because at least they realize the usefulness of reason and are opening themselves up to the standard that lead me &#8211; at least &#8211; to leaving faith altogether.</p>
<p>As soon as a person submits to the notion that reason should lead anyone back to their God &#8211; that reason gives glory to God &#8211; they are starting on the right track. No?</p>
<p>Sure, his logic is bad or non-existent, but at least he is starting on that path. But that is how I started, and look where I ended up! It&#8217;s better than those who just believe and are afraid to use logic. I&#8217;ve known plenty of people like that and they are walking contradictions &#8211; using reason whenever it is convenient and throwing it out whenever it comes to anything in their faith because &#8220;God is above reason&#8221;.</p>
<p>The trick is when someone finally realizes they cannot use reason to get the results they want, and instead they should accept the results of reason &#8211; where it leads.</p>
<p>Place reason above God and you will leave faith. Place God above reason and render theology meaningless. Since both lead to a contradiction, either reason does not exist or God does not. I can&#8217;t see how anything else is possible.</p>
<p>Hopefully people like Anders reach that point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quester</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2009/08/06/skepticism-vs-faith/#comment-36164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quester]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://de-conversion.com/?p=2995#comment-36164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joshua,

What exactly do you think he is trying, and why do you commend it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joshua,</p>
<p>What exactly do you think he is trying, and why do you commend it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2009/08/06/skepticism-vs-faith/#comment-36162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 03:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://de-conversion.com/?p=2995#comment-36162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least he is trying... the effort is commendable. I do think he tends to be a bit premature myself :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least he is trying&#8230; the effort is commendable. I do think he tends to be a bit premature myself <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeoPardus</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2009/08/06/skepticism-vs-faith/#comment-36160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LeoPardus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://de-conversion.com/?p=2995#comment-36160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All scientists and logicians reading Anders blog facepalm. Then they seek treatment for their migraines.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All scientists and logicians reading Anders blog facepalm. Then they seek treatment for their migraines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paleale</title>
		<link>http://de-conversion.com/2009/08/06/skepticism-vs-faith/#comment-36158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paleale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://de-conversion.com/?p=2995#comment-36158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Anders

Wow.  I&#039;m surprised you didn&#039;t fall to your death during one of the many leaps of illogic you made.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anders</p>
<p>Wow.  I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t fall to your death during one of the many leaps of illogic you made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
