Comments on: Whacked Bible Contradictions: 4 http://de-conversion.com/2009/11/03/whacked-bible-contradictions-4/ Resources for skeptical, de-converting, or former Christians...... Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:35:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Ken http://de-conversion.com/2009/11/03/whacked-bible-contradictions-4/#comment-39635 Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:27:42 +0000 http://de-conversion.com/?p=3398#comment-39635 Could be that they all just went nuts after seeing everyone and everything they had known blown to smithereens including mom turning into a giant salt lick. Girls just acting out from what they’d learned in the ‘hood and Dad a drunken wreck. No excuses, just the way it was written. Good folks do crazy things in tough times.

]]> By: Joe http://de-conversion.com/2009/11/03/whacked-bible-contradictions-4/#comment-38797 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:22:46 +0000 http://de-conversion.com/?p=3398#comment-38797 bIG (#35)–

I already shared my reasons (playing devil’s advocate) as to why Lot is called “righteous” biblically. One can do horrendous things —-David is a great example of that—–yet still be considered a “righteous” person due to their faith, and from asking for forgiveness for their horrible sins. The “righteousness” declared is coming from the divine perspective, not the human, as He would in the end know the hearts.

]]> By: BigHouse http://de-conversion.com/2009/11/03/whacked-bible-contradictions-4/#comment-38791 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:24:00 +0000 http://de-conversion.com/?p=3398#comment-38791 And my 28 was in response to your start to 27.

]]> By: BigHouse http://de-conversion.com/2009/11/03/whacked-bible-contradictions-4/#comment-38790 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:23:21 +0000 http://de-conversion.com/?p=3398#comment-38790 So, you agree, then that Lot being characterized as righteous is a Biblical contradiction?

]]> By: Joe http://de-conversion.com/2009/11/03/whacked-bible-contradictions-4/#comment-38786 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:25:28 +0000 http://de-conversion.com/?p=3398#comment-38786 Sorry for the repeat—-came up as anonymous the first time. :)

]]> By: Joe http://de-conversion.com/2009/11/03/whacked-bible-contradictions-4/#comment-38785 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:24:53 +0000 http://de-conversion.com/?p=3398#comment-38785 Big—

You started it in #28. I am simply responding to your enquiry my friend. :)

]]> By: Anonymous http://de-conversion.com/2009/11/03/whacked-bible-contradictions-4/#comment-38784 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:24:10 +0000 http://de-conversion.com/?p=3398#comment-38784 Big–

You’re too funny. You started it in #28. I’m sinply responding to your enquiry my friend. :)

]]> By: BigHouse http://de-conversion.com/2009/11/03/whacked-bible-contradictions-4/#comment-38782 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:00:43 +0000 http://de-conversion.com/?p=3398#comment-38782 Joe, are you focusing on this meaningless semantic sidepoint because you fear your understanding of this story and it’s place in the Bible has been shaken?

]]> By: Joe http://de-conversion.com/2009/11/03/whacked-bible-contradictions-4/#comment-38780 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:25:41 +0000 http://de-conversion.com/?p=3398#comment-38780 Big—

I mean do you say to a friend if you went to visit twice “I went to your house on multiple occasions” or do you say “I’ve been to your house twice” ? :)

]]> By: Joe http://de-conversion.com/2009/11/03/whacked-bible-contradictions-4/#comment-38779 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:24:19 +0000 http://de-conversion.com/?p=3398#comment-38779 Big—

Normally, one speaks like this:

Once, twice, multiple occasions (meaning you are starting to lose count). :)

]]>